"Break apart" order
Would it make sense for the "break apart" function to do so in reverse stacking order? When I use it, all the little parts get buried underneath all the larger object over top.
I'm not sure honestly if its easier to use as it is - or if the stacking order was reversed. The harder part about the way it is now, I need to select things, change the color and send it all to the back and then do the next sub-layer of stuff, etc..
if the order was revered, it would be in the correct order, but it might be harder to be sure I grabbed all the smaller detailed parts on top. any thoughts?
@Boldline I think this was requested before, it is in the backlog already as a feature request. Will be implemented.