On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles

[Ayo]

@VectorStyler said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

For (3) try Option+ dragging from the ruler corner (upper-left), to visually set the origin.

You mean Cmd I think. But that is for the origin. I referred to horizontal and vertical artboard guides.

Correction on my point 3. previous post:
"artboard rulers cannot be altered manually " should be:
"artboard GUIDES cannot be altered manually"

While I am testing your suggestion I can't create artboard guides at all. I am selecting 'Artboard' but they immediately jump to canvas now. Strange, maybe time to reboot.

[VectorStyler]

@Ayo said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

While I am testing your suggestion I can't create artboard guides at all.

Is this when dragging guidelines from the ruler, or creating in the Guidelines panel?

When dragging from the ruler, drag over the artboard and press Control, then it should be an artboard guideline.

[Ayo]

@VectorStyler said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

when dragging guidelines from the ruler

That works!
First drag then press Ctrl.
Not at the same time, you'll get the unit selector.

[VectorStyler]

@Ayo said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

First drag then press Ctrl.

BTW: this is a thing over all tools in VS, pressing a modifier key before the mouse or after the mouse leads to different actions.

[Ayo]

I noticed that the ruler has been modified in version 1.1.093. Probably because of my idea to use Small Caps Figures for the rulers.

Almost there but have a few more comments on that.

1. make figures a tiny little bit smaller for better contrast. Now it's a bit dubious. Illustrated also option to use different font for SC lookalike to compensate loss of weight.
2. lower figures, vertically align top tick marks as before.

[b77]

@Ayo I can't say I like the numbers being so close to the small tick marks, just so
the top will be at the same level with the top tick marks.

And while I personally wouldn't mind these to be a bit smaller, I have to ask what about
people with poor eyesight?

[VectorStyler]

@Ayo said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

I noticed that the ruler has been modified in version 1.1.093. Probably because of my idea to use Small Caps Figures for the rulers.

Yes.

I did hesitate a bit with the font size. It can become hard to read at smaller sizes.

[Ayo]

@VectorStyler

Small Cap Figures are actually not a different font size but only a different style.
Plus spacing helps readability.

[Ayo]

@b77 said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

I can't say I like the numbers being so close to the small tick

Indeed too close in the quick visual example. Example was about top lining. Long tick marks should be little longer to give more space below. All about detailing

[b77]

@Ayo Yes, the top tick marks could be just a bit taller.

Using small caps figures means running code that converts the values calculated
in "normal" numbers to small caps numbers, with possibly constant slower refresh
rates (lag) when you pan or zoom in or out.

And I'm not sure this is necessary, as the numbers can simply be displayed in Medium
instead of Regular, let's say.

(But as I said, personally I think the size & weight is a good compromise now).

[b77]

@Ayo Btw, do you know you can show the position of the selection on the
rulers if you enable 'Show Position in Ruler' in Prefs > Performance?

[Ayo]

@b77 Yes, ticked on, like that to see if I want rulers

[Ayo]

@Ayo said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

Small Cap Figures are actually not a different font size but only a different style.

FYI and perhaps superfluously, but I didn't know, that but SF-Compact has real drawn (not simulated) SC figures in its (rich)repertoire!

[VectorStyler]

@Ayo I will try find a way to use those for the ruler.

The problem is that in VS the document and the UI is rendered with different engines.
The document is rendered with VS own rendering engine, and it has all the OpenType font features.

The UI is rendered with the host OS (MacOS or Windows) and this one does not provide access to all these OpenType features.

Maybe the ruler needs its own font settings in the preferences?

[b77]

@Ayo Maybe I'm dense, but why should Small Caps be used for the rulers instead of
normal numbers in a thicker weight of SF Pro at a smaller font size?

[Ayo]

@VectorStyler said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

Maybe the ruler needs its own font settings in the preferences?

Well, it's not such an important point, but I stumbled over the big numbers. Looks a bit childish and/or for the elderly. Nothing wrong with that, but not technically anyway.

A separate setting? Since there are already so many settings, there is always something to add. It would then only give the small/large option. Don't make it too complicated.

Could also be a matter of weight to bring about some contrast. Look...

[Ayo]

@Ayo said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

Could also be a matter of weight to bring about some contrast. Look...

I think even better than the SC. Matches (belong to) the tick line style!

[Ayo]

@b77 said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

why should Small Caps be used for the rulers instead of
normal numbers in a thicker weight

Because they are optimized for it on the drawing board.

[b77]

@Ayo Are you saying that now in 1.1.093 the ruler numbers need to be thicker?
If so, to visually match what element?

…………………………………………………

In any case, just to make sure we are on the same page about Small Caps:

True Small Caps (which SF Pro indeed has) are special letters and numbers that
are shorter in height than the capitals, somewhere between capital height and
x-height (lowercase x height).

(Petite Caps are all x-height, btw).

As I'm sure you know already, true Small Caps are not simply scaled down capitals
and numbers — their weight is optimized to visually match the weight of the "normal"
uppercase and lowercase characters.

In this case, if the normal scaled down numbers would be used, they would
indeed look thinner — not matching the look of "normal" characters.

(But again, what element do the ruler numbers need to match visually?)

What I'm saying is that if smaller numbers with thicker weights are needed (if…),
I see no need to use Small Caps — Medium or SemiBold weights can be used
instead of Regular (or Regular instead of Light, etc).
……
(Again, sorry if I misunderstood something, it's a long thread…)

[fde101]

@VectorStyler said in On Ruler, guidelines and indicator line styles:

I did hesitate a bit with the font size. It can become hard to read at smaller sizes.

While I can read the @Ayo suggestion just fine on my non-retina monitor, it is kind of on the edge of it. I can easily see how for many users that would be a problem, so agree that it should be larger than what he had pictured.

As a point of reference I pulled out a physical ruler and looked at the centimeter scale along the edge. With the exception of the zero, the numbers are on the left side of the mark and right-aligned rather than being left-aligned to the right side of the mark they reflect, as is typical for physical rulers, but not for digital ones.

The more important thing I took note of (in terms of relevance to this discussion) is that the 20 (as an example) is 3 mm (three tick marks) wide and spaced 1 mm (one tick mark) from the 20 cm mark. In other words, even larger than on the version 1.1.092 ruler in comparison to its tick marks, and still slightly larger than in the version 1.1.092 ruler, when looking at the examples that @Ayo provided. The numbers on this suggestion appear to come closest to the 3mm sizing, but only because his tick marks are so much smaller. All of the examples show the numbers closer to the mark than they are on the physical ruler I was comparing against.