@Victor-Vector I love this too, VS seems to be an endless box of miracles

@b77 no problem

@b77 Added this to the (features) backlog, the numeric fields and scrolling has a few requests accumulated.

@vectoradmin ok I think that solved it. I did not fully understand what that "Control Handle Mode" choice would give me. I had it set to "all" and that explains why it grabbed even the invisible. Thank you for explaining.

@vectoradmin Sounds good to me. Happy to test it out when you add it to VS and give feedback

@vectoradmin I agree it does not need to be as advanced as the two dedicated programs mentioned earlier in the thread That said, if it's not too complicated to do a little more than the basics, I think that should be considered. checking out the two programs, there are some great control features I'm sure people would like. For example, being able to change the color of the text background and the mouse click indicator- even tying their color to the layer color is interesting. The ability to customize the length of time the displayed shortcut is on screen, the size of the displayed text, etc. https://github.com/keycastr/keycastr/blob/main/assets/mouse-click-visualizer.gif

@b77 Yes it should do that. But in this case for some reason it did not work, I have to test it more.

@Ingolf Well, everthing has its pro an cons. I am also fine with your idea of a panel and like it. Because it can contain more content.

@Ingolf I see what you did there. Thank you for the clarification.

@Boldline @vectoradmin what about some sort of "viewer" that shows the "delta" between the default settings and what the user has altered? This way you could get a short-list of any value you have changed from default.

@Jayanta-Das cool suggestion

@b77 awesome! I figured there was a good chance it already existed in there. thanks

@Victor-Vector said in Inspiration - less busy interface in Gravit Designer Pro: @Ingolf said in [Inspiration - less busy interface in Gravit Designer Pro] Interesting but in Blender the interface is extremely busy everywhere so I understand they make it optional to see this and that whereever they can. In the layers panel they show 5 icons and in a worst case 7. With the filter they are trying to put out a usability fire. In Vectorstyler the interface is generally pretty clean (except for the too many combine icons) and in the case of Vectorstyler I think the most elegant and user friendly method would be to just hide them like in Gravit. I think it would also work in Blender. I disagree, I think filters are a perfectly viable way to handle this particular interface situation that you have an issue with. Yeah, but if you take a close look, filters are often introduced when the interface gets complex and it is best to avoid that scenario alltogther if at all possible.

@vectoradmin Here why i choose the Envelope Shape Video: Why Envelope for Perspective [image: 1650871961964-why-envelope.png]

@b77 read a while ago that in India / Asia is a big corel user base. if you search for Corel Tutorials on Youtube you will note that.

@vectoradmin If i think about it i like the Option where the Shape Tool would also work on Clones the most. Because this way i will have more possibilities then with just a Symmetry Option in Shape Builder.

@vectoradmin hanks for the suggestion. I like the tool overall. That works ok but still leaves a think white line between the red and green in this case... it's not a bad thing for most purposes, but would be nice to have the option at some point for the totally clean cut. There are certain times that method is preferred. The cut out method still requires a fill shape, and cannot be a simply a stroke. [image: 1650476255605-dcda66cc-9962-4b95-b0ac-abee8947b831-bld-2022-04-20-at-13.36.04-resized.png]

@Boldline Added this to the backlog.

@Subpath said in Opening existing VS files in full main artboard view: @Ingolf In Corel it is no problem to rename your View according to your needs. I know, but I never use and never used the proposed generic name in AD or Corel so it is a problem for me that I have to rename every viewpoint I create. When it pops up with a suggestion (like snapshots do already) it requires just hitting ENTER to accept it. Not a big deal and easy to figure out as a user. Renaming is a additional proces that is breaks creating a viewpoint into two actions - the second requiring a lot more. It is simply bad UI design.